Audit Quality in the 21st Century: A Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda

Authors

  • Andi Irfan State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
  • Nindy Jaya Pramesti State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
  • Nurul Hidayah State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/

Keywords:

Audit Quality, Systematic Literature Review, Auditing Research, Islamic Audit, Artificial Intelligence, Mixed Methods, Ethical Auditing.

Abstract

This systematic literature review examines the evolution and multidimensional nature of audit quality research from 1981 to 2024. Analyzing 52 scholarly works, this study synthesizes key developments in audit quality conceptualization, measurement, and determinants. The review identifies four major research streams: (1) theoretical frameworks and conceptual foundations, (2) institutional and contextual factors, (3) ethical and spiritual dimensions, and (4) methodological innovations. Findings reveal that audit quality has evolved from a narrow focus on auditor characteristics to a comprehensive construct encompassing technical competence, ethical foundations, institutional environments, and technological integration. The review highlights emerging research areas, including the impact of artificial intelligence on audit practices, the integration of spiritual and ethical values in auditing, particularly within Islamic finance contexts, and the application of mixed-methods approaches. This study contributes to the literature by providing a holistic framework that integrates diverse perspectives on audit quality and proposes a future research agenda addressing critical gaps in understanding how technological disruption, sustainability concerns, and cultural diversity shape audit quality in global contexts.

References

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2018). Doing interviews. Sage Publications.

Carson, E., Fargher, N. L., Geiger, M. A., Lennox, C. S., Raghunandan, K., & Willekens, M. (2013). Audit reporting for going-concern uncertainty: A research synthesis. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Supplement 1), 353–384.

Cheek, J., & Morse, J. M. (2022). The power of qualitative research in mixed methods research designs. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research Design (pp. 636–651). Sage Publications.

Chen, L. (2016). Local institutions, audit quality, and corporate scandals of US-listed foreign firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(2), 351–373.

Chen, L., Krishnan, G. V., & Yu, W. (2018). The relation between audit fee cuts during the global financial crisis and earnings quality and audit quality. Advances in Accounting, 43, 14–31.

Christensen, B. E., Glover, S. M., Omer, T. C., & Shelley, M. K. (2016). Understanding audit quality: Insights from audit professionals and investors. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(4), 1648–1684.

Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. (2017). Enterprise risk management and the financial reporting process: The experiences of audit committee members, CFOs, and external auditors. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 1178–1209.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.

DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199.

DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2), 275–326.

Efferin, S., & Hutomo, C. C. (2021). Spirituality, happiness and auditors' commitment: An interbeing perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(4), 701–730.

Everett, J., & Tremblay, M.-S. (2014). Ethics and internal audit: Moral will and moral skill in a heteronomous field. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(3), 181–196.

Francis, J. R. (1994). Auditing, hermeneutics, and subjectivity. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(3), 235–269.

Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 125–152.

Hair Jr, J. F., Gabriel, M. L. D. S., Silva, D. da, & Braga, S. (2019). Development and validation of attitudes measurement scales: Fundamental and practical aspects. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(4), 490–507.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., & Babin, B. J. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson Education.

Holm, C., & Zaman, M. (2012). Regulating audit quality: Restoring trust and legitimacy. Accounting Forum, 36(1), 51–61.

Irfan, A., Triyuwono, I., Djamhuri, A., & Mulawarman, A. D. (2022). RSPO audit toward audit based on divinity values, is it true? Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Practices.

Irfan, A., Triyuwono, I., Djamhuri, A., & Mulawarman, A. D. (2024a). Islamic religious paradigm: Human nature of Abdul Muhaimin for the basic of audit philosophy. The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, 32(3).

Irfan, A., Triyuwono, I., Djamhuri, A., & Mulawarman, A. D. (2024b). Konstruksi filosofi audit dalam perspektif Al-Ashr [Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Brawijaya].

Irfan, A., Triyuwono, I., Djamhuri, A., & Mulawarman, A. D. (2024c). Roundtable on sustainable palm oil certification: Advancing sustainability through phenomenology studies of transcendent auditing practices. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 8(1), 76–95.

Israel, M. (2014). Research ethics and integrity for social scientists: Beyond regulatory compliance. Sage Publications.

Jin, J. Y., Kanagaretnam, K., & Lobo, G. J. (2011). Ability of accounting and audit quality variables to predict bank failure during the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(11), 2811–2819.

Kasim, N., Sanusi, Z. M., Handoyo, S., & Mutamimah, T. (2012). The scope of Shariah audit in Islamic financial institutions: A comparative study of Malaysia and Indonesia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Islamic Finance.

Kasim, N., Sanusi, Z. M., Mutamimah, T., & Handoyo, S. (2013). Assessing the current practice of auditing in Islamic financial institutions in Malaysia and Indonesia. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 4(6), 414–419.

Khatib, S. F. A., Abdullah, D. F., Al Amosh, H., Bazhair, A. H., & Kabara, A. S. (2022). Shariah auditing: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 13(5), 791–818.

Knechel, W. R. (2016). Audit quality and regulation. International Journal of Auditing, 20(3), 215–223.

Knechel, W. R., & Shefchik, L. B. (2014). Audit quality. In The Routledge companion to auditing (pp. 152–169). Routledge.

Knechel, W. R., Krishnan, G. V., Pevzner, M., Shefchik, L. B., & Velury, U. K. (2013). Audit quality: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Supplement 1), 385–421.

Lamm, K., Lamm, A., & Edgar, D. (2020). Scale development and validation: Methodology and recommendations. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 27(2), 24–35.

Mansouri, A., Pirayesh, R., & Salehi, M. (2009). Audit competence and audit quality: Case in emerging economy. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(2), 17–25.

Marnet, O. (2021). Joint audit and audit quality. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Morgan, D. L. (2018). Basic and advanced focus groups. Sage Publications.

Morse, J. M., Niehaus, L., & Press, L. C. (2021). Procedures and practice of mixed method design. In SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (pp. 339–368). Sage Publications.

Nagpal, D., Kornerup, I., & Gibson, M. P. (2021). Mixed-method research: A basic understanding. CODS Journal of Dentistry, 12(1), 11–16.

Rafie, M. (2023). Ethical foundations: Exploring the impact of Islamic ethics on auditing quality. Religion, Management & Governance, 1(2).

Salehi, M., Komeili, F., & Daemi Gah, A. (2019). The impact of financial crisis on audit quality and audit fee stickiness: Evidence from Iran. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 17(2), 201–221.

Simnett, R., Carson, E., & Vanstraelen, A. (2016). International archival auditing and assurance research: Trends, methodological issues, and opportunities. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(3), 1–32.

Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant observation. Waveland Press.

Tabara, N., & Ungureanu, M. (2012). Internal audit and its role in improving corporate governance systems. Annales Universitatis Apulensis: Series Oeconomica, 14(1), 139–146.

Tejada, J. J., & Punzalan, J. R. B. (2012). On the misuse of Slovin's formula. The Philippine Statistician, 61(1), 129–136.

y Mpofu, F. (2023). The application of artificial intelligence in external auditing and its implications on audit quality: A review of the ongoing debates. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 12(9), 496–512.

Zahmatkesh, S., & Rezazadeh, J. (2017). The effect of auditor features on audit quality. Tékhne, 15(2), 79–87.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Audit Quality in the 21st Century: A Comprehensive Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. (2025). Proceeding International Conference on Economic and Social Sciences, 3, 261-280. https://doi.org/10.5281/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 144

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>