Multi-Actor Collaborative Networks in Family Resilience Policy: Exploring Resource Exchange Dynamics in Pekanbaru City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/Keywords:
Collaborative Networks, Resource Dynamics, Family Resilience, Multi-Actor Governance, IndonesiaAbstract
Family resilience policy represents a complex governance arena requiring multi-actor cooperation across government levels, civil society, and private sector. The complexity of family-related challenges in rapid urbanization contexts demands governance approaches that transcend traditional sectoral boundaries. Despite growing interest in multi-actor governance, empirical studies exploring resource exchange dynamics in family policy networks remain limited, particularly in developing country contexts. This research employs a qualitative interpretive approach to explore resource exchange dynamics among actors in family resilience policy implementation in Pekanbaru City. Analysis identifies eight primary actors in the family resilience policy network with complementary resource contributions. BKKBN serves as provider of policy framework and national funding, DP3AP2KB as provincial network facilitator, Disdalduk KB as local implementation coordinator, while PKK and community activists function as vital bridges between formal and informal structures. The research reveals funding coordination challenges stemming from different budget sources (national vs local) and finds dominance of informal support systems over formal services. PKK occupies a unique position as "super connector" with paradoxical dependence on government actors, while family counselors experience marginalization in administratively-dominated coordination networks. This research reveals dynamic collaborative networks with multi-level governance structures that create both opportunities and challenges. Findings indicate that effective family resilience policy requires hybrid governance models integrating formal-informal resource systems, APBN-APBD funding cycle synchronization, and strengthened professional service integration mechanisms. This research offers practical insights for designing more effective multi-actor collaborative architectures in complex social policy domains and enriches understanding of resource exchange dynamics in Indonesian governance contexts.
References
Agusta Ari Wibowo, & Indra Kertati. (2022). Reformasi Birokrasi Dan Pelayanan Publik. Public Service and Governance Journal, 3(1), 01–12. https://doi.org/10.56444/psgj.v3i1.628
Gedeona, H. T. (2013). Tinjauan Teoritis Pengelolaan Jaringan (Networking Management) Dalam Studi Kebijakan Publik. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 10(3), 360–372.
Ismail, A. M. I., & Ariyadi, A. (2022). IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FAMILY PLANNING VILLAGE PROGRAM IN UJUNGE VILLAGE, MADELLO VILLAGE, BALUSU DISTRICT, BARRU DISTRICT. In Meraja journal. merajajournal.com. https://merajajournal.com/index.php/mrj/article/download/238/207
Koppenjan, E. hans K. and J. (2016). Governance Networks in the public sector. Routledge.
Kusnadi, I. H. (2020). CREATING EFFECTIVENESS OF NUTRITION POLICY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IN SUBANG REGENCY. In CosmoGov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan.
Martinez, L. (2011). Governance Networks as Collaborative Platforms for Innovation in The Public Sector. October, 1–13. https://rucforsk.ruc.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/37449485/Laias_final_paper_for_the_PhD_course_Governance_Network_October_2011.pdf
Maulana, D., & Yulianti, R. (2022). Multi-Actor Collaboration in Improving the Economy of the Fishing Community in Karangantu Coastal Area of Serang, Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Governance …. http://journal.ppishk.org/index.php/jcgpp/article/view/80
Muklis, A., Hidayat, M. T., & Nariyah, H. (2022). Collaborative Governance Pentahelix dalam Proses Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan Hidup (AMDAL) di Kabupaten Cirebon. Ijd-Demos, 4(1), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.37950/ijd.v4i1.202
Ner, N. T., Okyere, S. A., Abunyewah, M., Frimpong, L. K., & Kita, M. (2023). The Resilience of a Resettled Flood-Prone Community: An Application of the RABIT Framework in Pasig City, Metro Manila. Sustainability, 15(8), 6953. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086953
Nugroho, R. (2023). Public Policy 7: Dinamika Kebijakan Publik, Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Manajemen Politik Kebijakan Publik, Etika Kebijakan Publik. books.google.com. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=WCG_EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=collaborative+governance+kebijakan+ketahanan+keluarga&ots=ilvAynHLW6&sig=2j20koc_AqdN15w7cFxe30S3ROY
Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Acar, M. (2013). Review of The Handbook of Public Administration . In Journal of Public Affairs Education (Vol. 19, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2013.12001763
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076586
Riska Chyntia Dewi, & Suparno Suparno. (2022). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Media Administrasi, 7(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.56444/jma.v7i1.67
Saputra, D. H., Muhlis, L. P., Ilmy, M., Suparno, A., Nasuhi, M., & Mufidah, M. (2021). Implementation of Good Governance and Clean Governance Towards an Effective and Dignity Bureaucracy. Pinisi Discretion Review, 4(2), 327. https://doi.org/10.26858/pdr.v4i2.21491
Siciliano, M. D., & Whetsell, T. A. (2021). Strategies of Network Intervention: A Pragmatic Approach to Policy Implementation and Public Problem Resolution through Network Science. February. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.08197
Sopia Rukmana S, N., Alwi, A., & Susanti, G. (2019). Complexity and Public Policy: Network Model of Food Security Policy Implementation in Bone Regency. Iapa Proceedings Conference, 522. https://doi.org/10.30589/proceedings.2019.254
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01753.x
Walsh, F. (2016). Applying a Family Resilience Framework in Training, Practice, and Research: Mastering the Art of the Possible. Family Process, 55(4), 616–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12260
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pivit Septiary Chandra, Seno Andri, Febri Yuliani, Dadang Mashur
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
